MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151352872 · doi:10.1080/15325000601175199

Analytical Response of Synchronous Generators during Load Rejection and Field Short-circuit Tests

2007· article· en· W2151352872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorGenerator (circuit theory)Load rejectionShunt generatorControl theory (sociology)TrippingVoltageComputationPermanent magnet synchronous generatorComputer scienceField (mathematics)WaveformEquivalent circuitElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringAlgorithmCircuit breakerMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a recent work, the authors developed what they called a numerical hybrid state model and used it to predict the performance of a saturated synchronous generator during load rejection tests. The state matrices were presented in compact numerical form and may prove tedious to implement for a given application. Therefore, the purpose of the present article is to derive these matrices in terms of the generator's physical parameters using symbolic software. For direct and easy computation of the model output variables, time-variant analytical waveforms of the phase voltages and the field current following a generator tripping (load rejection) and an open stator field short-circuit are also developed in terms of the generator parameters using the state model solution of the linear control systems theory. Two full-load rejection tests, one with an inductive load, other with a capacitive load and a standard field short-circuit test with the stator in open circuit are performed. Comparisons are made between the simulation results and actual data obtained from a laboratory machine to assess the suitability and effectiveness of the proposed synchronous generator framework analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it