MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151353857 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2007.4511115

Design and Implementation of a Decimation Filter For High Performance Audio Applications

2007· article· en· W2151353857 on OpenAlexaff
Khalid H. Abed, S.B. Nerurkar, Stephen Colaco

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsAdvantage Forensics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecimationModelSimFinite impulse responseComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Field-programmable gate arrayDigital signal processingComputer hardwareCascaded integrator–comb filterFilter designLow-pass filterHigh-pass filterDigital filterElectronic engineeringEmbedded systemRoot-raised-cosine filterAlgorithmEngineeringVHDLComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we deal with the design and practical implementation of a decimation filter used for high performance audio applications. We implemented the decimation filter using the canonic signed digit (CSD) representation. The decimation filter was simulated using Matlab, and its complete architecture was realized using DSP Blockset and Simulink. The filter was implemented using Mentor Graphic ModelSim and Calibre Tool in FPGA technology. The resulting architecture is hardware efficient and consumes less power compared to conventional decimation filters. Compared to the comb-FIR-FIR-FIR architecture, the designed decimation filter architecture contributes to a hardware saving of 69 %; in addition, it reduces the power dissipation by 28 %, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207