Determination of Aspartame Levels in Soft Drinks Consumed in Ankara, Turkey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Aspartame is commonly used as artificial sweeteners in several food products. Excess amounts of aspartame can be harmful to human health. Therefore, the investigation of aspartame levels in foods is important. The aim of this study was to determine levels of aspartame<strong> </strong>in soft drinks and to evaluate whether these amounts were within the Turkish Food Codex values or not. For this purpose, total number of 90 soft drink samples (A, B, C, D, E and F brands) including 15 from each brand were collected from supermarkets in Ankara province, Turkey . In this study, spectrophotometric method was used for the quantitative determination of aspartame in the samples. Mean levels (± S.E) of aspartame<sub> </sub>in samples of A, B, C, D, E and F brand were found as 156.81±7.29 mg/L, 208.67±8.97 mg/L, 236.58±17.91 mg/L, 299.54±26.19 mg/L, 202.39±8.08 mg/L and 223.28±14.08 mg/L, respectively. Our data revealed that mean levels of aspartame were found within Turkish Food Codex in all samples. However, some samples were not found appropriate according to the label information.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".