Distributed Robust Scheduling and Power Control For Cognitive Spatial-Reuse TDMA Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the distributed robust transmission scheduling and power control problem in a cognitive spatial-reuse time division multiple access (STDMA) network. In particular, we address the problem of minimizing the transmission length (in terms of time-slots) of the secondary links under their minimum quality-of-service (QoS) requirements without violating the maximum tolerable interference limit for the primary receivers. Traditionally, the joint transmission scheduling and power control problem only considers the average link gains; therefore, QoS violation can occur due to improper power allocation with respect to instantaneous channel gain realization. To overcome this problem of QoS violation, our problem formulation takes the channel gain uncertainty into account. Since an optimal solution cannot be obtained due to the NP-completeness of the problem, we propose a novel distributed two-stage algorithm based on the distributed column generation method to obtain the near-optimal solution for the robust transmission schedules in an ad-hoc cognitive radio network. To demonstrate its relative efficiency, our algorithm is compared with previously proposed algorithms. For the proposed algorithm, we also derive the bounds on the probability of signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraint violation and the expected number of additional time-slots required to satisfy the traffic demand requirements of secondary links.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".