MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151439648 · doi:10.1051/eas/1256027

Mass-loading in Galactic Winds: the Role of Photoevaporation and Wind Ablation

2012· article· en· W2151439648 on OpenAlexaff
Sherry Yeh, Christopher D. Matzner

Bibliographic record

VenueEAS Publications Series · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoevaporationPhysicsAstrophysicsAblationRam pressureStellar windJovianAstronomyStarsStar formationPlanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a dynamical scenario of instantaneous dense gas entrainment by stellar winds in a wind-dominated HII region. Stellar winds and radiation pressure will become more important in an HII region as the central star or cluster is sufficiently luminous, therefore the region is windswept instead of photoevaporation-dominated. In our model, a cloud is smaller than the region as a whole, hence its mass injection occurs through either ordinary photoevaporation or wind ablation. We predict that the instantaneous wind ablation will cause strong mixing between hot winds and warm gas, and the mass injection rate of the wind-confined photoevaporated flow is higher than that of the ionizing source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEAS Publications SeriesSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207