MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151451253 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2004.825248

A Multiply-by-3 Coupled-Ring Oscillator for Low-Power Frequency Synthesis

2004· article· en· W2151451253 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shwetabh Verma, Junfeng Xu, T.H. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariable-frequency oscillatorVackář oscillatorFrequency synthesizerVoltage-controlled oscillatorRing oscillatorDelay line oscillatorSwingFrequency driftDigitally controlled oscillatorElectrical engineeringVoltagePhysicsPower (physics)Ring (chemistry)Frequency dividerFrequency multiplierLocal oscillatorCMOSOptoelectronicsPhase-locked loopPhase noiseEngineeringAcousticsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A frequency-synthesis technique which extracts the Nth harmonic from an N-stage oscillator is presented. This technique enables significant power savings in the prescaler of a frequency synthesizer. The maximum achievable voltage swing from such an oscillator is estimated. To study this technique, a multiply-by-3 circuit with two 180/spl deg/-coupled single-ended three-stage ring oscillators has been fabricated in 0.24-/spl mu/m CMOS, designed to work in the 902-928-MHz ISM band (U.S. and Canada). It provides two outputs: one at the normal operating frequency of the oscillator and the other at three times that frequency. The circuit can work at voltages as low as 1.3 V, while consuming 210 /spl mu/A of current.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207