MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151497882 · doi:10.1109/pesc.2008.4592683

Correlation technique investigation for islanding detection of inverter based distributed generation

2008· article· en· W2151497882 on OpenAlexaff
Mamadou Lamine Doumbia, Kodjo Agbossou, Dung Tran Khanh Viet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingDistributed generationInverterGridComputer sciencePower (physics)InterconnectionElectronic engineeringLimit (mathematics)Line (geometry)Control theory (sociology)EngineeringVoltageMathematicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islanding detection is an important R&D topic in the area of distributed generation (DG) interconnection with utility grid. For many years, different anti-islanding protection methods were developed for inverter based distributed generation. However, most of these methods have limit capability for detecting islanding when multiple DGs have to be connected with one distribution line. This paper proposes an islanding detection method based on correlation technique. Analytical and simulation analyses of the correlation method are presented. Single and multiple DGs islanding detection schemes were investigated for different operating conditions including the most difficult one when the DG output power matches the local load power. The critical case-studies show that correlation method is effective for both single and multiple grid connected DG systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207