MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151503546 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425888

Exact Closed-Form Expressions for the Outage Probability and Ergodic Capacity of Decode-and-Forward Opportunistic Relaying

2009· article· en· W2151503546 on OpenAlex
Reza Nikjah, Norman C. Beaulieu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErgodic theoryRayleigh fadingRelayFadingMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Outage probabilityStatisticsTelecommunicationsMultiplexingSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer sciencePower (physics)Decoding methodsCombinatoricsPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exact statistics of the local signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the best relay in decode-and-forward (DF) opportunistic relaying (ORe) are derived. It is observed that although the different links are assumed to suffer independent fadings, the best-relay local SNRs are dependent. Both joint and marginal statistics are determined for the general case of nonidentical SNR distributions, and a source-relay-symmetric (S-R-sym.), relay-destination-symmetric (R-D-sym.) case. Both general fading and Rayleigh fading cases are considered. Using the statistics derived, exact, closed-form expressions for the outage probability and ergodic capacity of DF ORe are calculated in the S-R-sym., RD-sym., Rayleigh fading case. The exact results for the outage probability show almost linearly increasing diversity order with the number of relays. The exact results for the ergodic capacity show a multiplexing gain almost equaling one half and a power gain increasing with the number of relays that exhibits diminishing returns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it