MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151516344 · doi:10.1109/pes.2009.5275712

A knowledge based expert system for the pre-feasibility analysis of an energy storage system in a wind-diesel isolated power grid

2009· article· en· W2151516344 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael S. Ross, Rodrigo Hidalgo, G. Joós

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsExpert systemRenewable energyWind powerEnergy storageAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceDiesel fuelElectric power systemGridProcess (computing)Energy consumptionComputer data storageProcess engineeringSystems engineeringReliability engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A knowledge based expert system has been designed in order to imitate the decision-making process used by human experts. This expert system has been developed to carry out a pre-feasibility analysis of an energy storage system in an isolated power system, with both wind and diesel generation. Energy storage can be used to optimize the energy from renewable sources and reduce fuel consumption, offering economic and environmental advantages. The expert system performs a preliminary technical and economical analysis of the system when it determines that there is excess energy that can be stored. The analysis performed helps the user as initial step towards further analysis and design. Results show how the implementation of an ESS would reduce the fuel consumption when compared to the analysis of the system without energy storage, which could financially validate its initial investment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207