MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151528054 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2005.855738

Multiport MEMS-based waveguide and coaxial switches

2005· article· en· W2151528054 on OpenAlexaff
Mojgan Daneshmand, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroelectromechanical systemsCoaxialBandwidth (computing)Return lossActuatorInsertion lossCommunications satelliteExtremely high frequencyElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringCrossover switchMiniaturizationEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsCrossbar switchTelecommunicationsSatelliteAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new concept of three-dimensional (3-D) multiport RF microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) switches is introduced. The proposed structures are based on integrated MEMS actuators inside 3-D waveguide and coaxial structures. These switches are well suited for high-power redundancy switch matrices for satellite communication, as well as millimeter-wave applications. To demonstrate the concept, a C-type waveguide switch is fabricated and tested. The use of a unique bi-layer curled electrostatic actuators, results in a very good RF performance with an isolation of 36-40 dB and a return loss of -20dB over a 7% bandwidth at satellite Ku-band. This paper also presents for the first time a new type of MEMS-based coaxial switch, which can offer a much larger bandwidth with miniaturized dimensions. To prove the concept, prototype units of single-pole single-throw and C-type switches are designed, fabricated, and tested. The measured results demonstrate a bandwidth of 65% for the C-type MEMS-based coaxial switch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207