MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151634152 · doi:10.1109/wescan.1993.270518

Real-time dynamic arithmetic coding for low bit-rate channels

2002· article· en· W2151634152 on OpenAlexaff
L. Wall, Ken Ferens, Witold Kinsner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuffman codingArithmetic codingComputer scienceArithmeticVariable-length codeData compressionContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingCoding (social sciences)AlgorithmDecoding methodsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present an implementation and thereby demonstrate the capability of real-time and dynamic arithmetic coding in low-bit-rate serial communications channels. Data files from disk and text entered from the keyboard were compressed in real time using dynamic arithmetic coding. Each character in the source stream was compressed and an arithmetic code stream formed. The code stream was transmitted through an RS-232 channel at bit rates up to 19.2 kb/s. The effective transmission rate, kappa , is greater than the actual transmission rate, where kappa is equivalent to the achieved compression ratio for these low bit rates. Arithmetic coding achieves, on average, a reduction of 15% for binary files, 45% for text files, and up to 90% for special files such as bit maps. For each of these files arithmetic coding achieved better compression ratios than traditional entropy coding techniques, such as Huffman and Shannon-Fano. A software implementation on a 386 IBM compatible computer is described.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207