Catalytic Pyrolysis of Low Rank Canadian Boundary Dam Coal over ZSM‐5 and LTL Zeolites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic pyrolysis of low‐rank coal (boundary dam lignite coal) for production of valuable chemical compounds, such as aromatics, over zeolites has been investigated with promising results. In this study, primarily zeolites ZSM‐5 (zeolite socony mobil‐5) and LTL (Linde type L) were successfully synthesized by a direct hydrothermal method without using any templates, known as structure directing agents (SDAs). Various analysis methods were employed to characterize the parent and modified zeolites before catalyzing the pyrolysis of coal. The H‐form of zeolite LTL showed the best performance for phenol, methane, and hydrogen formations in slow pyrolysis of coal at a temperature range of 400–600 °C and heating rate of 5° C/min. The effect of zeolite LTL potassium content on changing the coal decomposition path is suggested to enhance the production of these compounds along with cracking activity of the acid sites of the zeolites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".