MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151656146 · doi:10.1139/v05-135

Catalyzed β scission of a carbenium ion Mechanistic differences from varying catalyst basicity

2005· article· en· W2151656146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCatalysisCarbenium ionBond cleavageIonHydroxideChloridePhotochemistryReaction mechanismReaction intermediateComputational chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The β-scission mechanism of physisorbed and chemisorbed pentenium ions, as catalyzed by AlH 2 (OH) 2 – and by AlHCl 3 – anions, was investigated using density functional theory computations and explicit-contact modelling. A thorough search of intermediates was performed for each catalyst. On the aluminum chloride, β scission of an aliphatic, secondary carbenium ion featured chemisorbed and physisorbed ion intermediates, while on the aluminum hydroxide, β scission featured chemisorbed ions but physisorbed neutral species. The importance of this work is its demonstration of a qualitatively different mechanism, with qualitatively different intermediates, due only to the different basicity of the two catalysts.Key words: C—C bond fission, β scission, carbenium ion, catalysis, mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it