Rapid high‐resolution <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> mapping by variable flip angles: Accurate and precise measurements in the presence of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid 3D mapping of T(1) relaxation times is valuable in diverse clinical applications. Recently, the variable flip angle (VFA) spoiled gradient recalled echo approach was shown to be a practical alternative to conventional methods, providing better precision and speed. However, the method is known to be sensitive to transmit field (B(1) (+)) inhomogeneity and can result in significant systematic errors in T(1) estimates, especially at high field strengths. The main challenge is to improve the accuracy of the VFA approach without sacrificing speed. In this article, the VFA method was optimized for both accuracy and precision by considering the influence of imperfect transmit fields, noise bias, and selection of flip angles. An analytic solution was developed for systematic B(1) (+)-induced T(1) errors and allows simple correction of T(1) measurements acquired with any imaging parameters. A noise threshold was also identified and provided a guideline for avoiding T(1) biases. Finally, it was shown that three flip angles were the most efficient for maintaining accuracy and high precision over large ranges of T(1). A rapid B(1) (+) mapping sequence was employed in all phantom experiments and high-field in vivo brain scans. Experimental results confirmed the theory and validated the accuracy of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it