MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151688334 · doi:10.2138/am-2014-4880

Agakhanovite-(Y), ideally (YCa) 2KBe3Si12O30, a new milarite-group mineral from the Heftetjern pegmatite, Tordal, Southern Norway: Description and crystal structure

2014· article· en· W2151688334 on OpenAlexaff
F. C. Hawthorne, Y. A. Abdu, N. A. Ball, P. erny, Roy Kristiansen

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessPleochroismCrystallographyPegmatiteElectron microprobeCrystal structureMaterials scienceMineralChemistryMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agakhanovite-(Y), ideally (YCa)⃞2KBe 3 Si 12 O 30 , is a new milarite-group mineral from the Heftetjern pegmatite, Tørdal, southern Norway. Crystals are prismatic along [001], and show the forms {100} and {100}. Agakhanovite-(Y) is colorless with a white streak and a vitreous luster, and does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light. There is no cleavage or parting, and no twinning was observed. Mohs hardness is 6, and agakhanovite-(Y) is brittle with a conchoidal fracture. The calculated density is 2.672 g/cm 3 . Optical properties were measured with the Bloss spindle stage for the wavelength 590 nm using a gel filter. Agakhanovite-(Y) is uniaxial (-) with indices of refraction w = 1.567, e = 1.564, both ±0.002; the calculated birefringence is 0.003 and it is non-pleochroic. Agakhanovite-(Y) is hexagonal, space group P6/mcc, a = 10.3476(2), c = 13.7610(3) Å, V = 1276.02(9) Å 3 , Z = 2, c:a = 1.330. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern are as follows: d (Å), I, (hkl): 2.865, 100, (1̅24); 3.287, 96, (1̅31); 4.134, 84, (1̅22); 6.877, 56, (002); 2.986, 43, (030); 4.479, 38, (020); 2.728, 36, (024). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave SiO 2 69.56, Al 2 O 3 0.35, Y 2 O 3 9.69, Yb 2 O 3 0.15, FeO 0.02 CaO 5.75, Na 2 O 0.07, K 2 O 4.52, BeO(calc) 7.06, H 2 O(calc) 1.74, sum 98.91 wt%. The H 2 O content was determined by crystal-structure analysis. On the basis of 30 anions, the empirical formula is (Y 0.89 Yb 0.01 Ca 1.06 )S 1.96 (H 2 O) 0.92 Na 0.02 K 1.00 (Be 2.93 Al 0.07 )S 3.00 Si 12.02 O 30 . The crystal structure of agakhanovite-(Y) was refined to an R 1 index of 1.9% based on 660 unique observed reflections collected on a three-circle rotating-anode (MoKa X-radiation) diffractometer equipped with multilayer optics and an APEX-II detector. In the end-member structure of agakhanovite-(Y), the A site is occupied equally by Y and Ca, and the B site is vacant; agakhanovite-(Y) is the Y-analog of oftedalite: ScCa⃞ 2 KBe 3 Si 12 O 30 , and the Y-Ca-Be analog of klöchite, (Fe 2+ Fe 3+ )⃞ 2 KZn 3 Si 12 O 30 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207