MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151689596

Large Cecal Lipoma With Overlying Ulceration Simulating Malignancy: A Case Report and Review of Relevant Literature

2013· article· en· W2151689596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColonoscopyLipomaBiopsyMalignancyAbdominal painRadiologyBowel obstructionSurgeryColorectal cancerPathologyInternal medicineCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastrointestinal lipomas are rare, usually single, slow growing benign non-epithelial tumors. Most colonic lipomas are asymptomatic and are usually detected incidentally during colonoscopy, surgery or autopsy. In a small percentage of cases, especially when their diameter is greater than 2 cm, they can cause symptoms. The common presenting symptoms include constipation, diarrhea, colicky abdominal pain, change in bowel habit, bowel obstruction, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, intussusception or prolapse. Imaging techniques, including CT and MRI are regularly used. However, preoperative diagnosis of colonic lipoma is often difficult with the majority of the lesions diagnosed by laparotomy and definitive diagnosis is made based on histopathological examination. Colonoscopy permits direct visualization of the submucosal lipoma. Endoscopy can usually distinguish lipomas from other tumors. Lipomas are seen as smooth, rounded yellowish polyps with a thick stalk or broad-based attachment. Typical colonoscopy features are the “ tent sign ” (elevation of the mucosa over lipoma with biopsy forceps), “ cushion sign ” or “ pillow sign ” (pressing forceps against the lesion results in depression or pillowing of the mass) and the “ naked fat sign ” (extrusion of yellowish fat at the biopsy site. The mucosa overlying a colonic lipoma is intact. In rare cases, colonoscopy may reveal large-sized flat-shaped mass with ulceration that may lead to an impression of malignancy. Colonoscopic biopsy is often performed to determine the exact nature of the tumor. However colonic lipomas may result in mucosal inflammation of adjacent tissue giving the false impression of “ nonspecific colitis ” . This is particularly true in cases of inadequate tissue sample. Recently, virtual colonoscopy has been performed to detect colonic lipomas. Lipomas less than 2 cm in diameter can be removed endoscopically whereas larger lesions should be removed surgically either by open or laparoscopic methods. Colonoscopic resection of large colonic lipomas remains a controversial subject till date. Although a wide range of operative techniques including colostomy and excision, hemicolectomy or subtotal colectomy are employed, segmental resection is usually the procedure of choice. We describe a patient with persistent abdominal pain who underwent open right hemicolectomy for the presumptive endoscopic diagnosis of cecal adenocarcinoma and discuss diagnostic modalities and treatment options. Histological examination confirmed that the resected specimen was a giant benign cecal lipoma. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jcs34w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it