MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151765172 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2003.808891

Observer-based iterative learning control for a class of time-varying nonlinear systems

2003· article· en· W2151765172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterative learning controlControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Tracking errorNonlinear systemMathematicsState observerConvergence (economics)Computer scienceControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this brief, we propose an observer-based iterative learning control (ILC) scheme for the tracking problem of a class of time-varying nonlinear systems. First, a state observer is derived for the system under consideration, and sufficient conditions for the boundedness and the convergence to zero of the estimation error are given. Thereafter, an iterative learning rule - based on the proposed state observer - ensuring the boundedness of the tracking error is derived. Moreover, it is shown that if the initial state variables are known, it is possible to obtain a perfect convergence to zero, over a finite tracking horizon, when the number of iterations tends to infinity. By associating a state observer with the ILC scheme it is possible to avoid the use of state and output time-derivative measurements which are generally necessary in contraction mapping based ILC design for nonlinear systems without zero relative degree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it