MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151778521 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.060

Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With Spina Bifida: A Prospective Assessment Before and After Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction

2009· article· en· W2151778521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpina bifidaMedicineColumbia universityPediatric urologyProspective cohort studyEmergency departmentUrinary systemEpidemiologyGeneral surgeryPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: In a previous retrospective cohort study we challenged the assumption that lower urinary tract reconstruction improves health related quality of life in spina bifida cases. We readdressed this issue prospectively in a new series of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 consecutive incontinent patients with spina bifida undergoing reconstruction with a continent stoma with or without augmentation, with or without bladder neck reconstruction and with or without cecostomy were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively with the Parkin disease specific health related quality of life score. The instrument stratifies patients by ages 12 years or younger and 13 years or older. An additional 4-item questionnaire was used to score bladder and bowel continence. RESULTS: There was no significant change in health related quality of life following surgery in either age group. The median score changed from 167 to 174 in patients 12 years old or younger (p = 0.74) and from 199 to 193 in patients 13 years old or older (p = 0.42) despite a significant improvement in scores on all continence questions (p <0.05). In patients 12 years old or younger there was significant improvement in 3 items in the domains of independence and emotional expression (p <0.05). In adolescents 4 items changed significantly, and all were related to the independence and emotional domains (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvement in some question items we did not note an improvement in overall quality of life following reconstruction. Correcting only 1 system in a profound multisystem disability may be insufficient to improve health related quality of life or perhaps only caregiver quality of life is improved. The impact of lower urinary tract reconstruction on quality of life in patients with spina bifida requires further assessment before improvements are assumed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it