MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151782034 · doi:10.2196/medinform.4226

Metadata Correction: Making Big Data Useful for Health Care: A Summary of the Inaugural MIT Critical Data Conference

2015· erratum· en· W2151782034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Omar Badawi, Thomas P. Brennan, Leo Anthony Celi, Mengling Feng, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Andrea Ippolito, Alistair E. W. Johnson, Roger G. Mark, Louis Mayaud, G.B. Moody, Christopher Moses, Tristan Naumann, Vipan Nikore, Marco A. F. Pimentel, Tom Pollard, Mauro César de Oliveira Santos, David J. Stone, Andrew J. Zimolzak

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2015
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Library scienceArt historyArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Omar Badawi, PharmD, MPH; Thomas Brennan, PhD; Leo Anthony Celi, MD, MPH, MS; Mengling Feng, PhD; Marzyeh Ghassemi, MS; Andrea Ippolito, MS, MEng; Alistair Johnson; Roger G Mark, MD, PhD; Louis Mayaud, PhD; George Moody; Christopher Moses; Tristan Naumann, MS; Vipan Nikore, MD, MBA; Marco Pimentel, MS; Tom J Pollard; Mauro Santos; David J Stone, MD; Andrew Zimolzak, MD, MS; MIT Critical Data Conference 2014 Organizing Committee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0090.009
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.456
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207