Normative Institutional Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention in Iranian Information Technology Sector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The entrepreneurial intention has been considered as the key element to understand the new-firm creation process. Environment is an important element in entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial intention is affected by environmental events. In fact, environment could be either a facilitator or an impediment to entrepreneurial intention in a society. Institution is an important factor in entrepreneurship fostering and identifying the target group's needs is the first step in entrepreneurship development with institutional approach. This approach to entrepreneurship result in focusing on norms, believes and regulatory affecting individual and organizations which differ in different societies and cultures. The Purpose of this study is to identify the effective normative Institutional factors on entrepreneurial intention in Iranian context based on institutional theory and theory of planned behavior. This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews on a sample of 10 entrepreneurs in Information Technology (IT) sector. After content analysis, the results will reveal a list of the normative institutional factors which affect entrepreneurs' intention. These factors consist of "family context", "societies' norms and believe"," the expectations from women" and "the technology growth in a country" which play an important role on entrepreneur's intention to start a firm in Information Technology sector in Iran.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it