MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151834132 · doi:10.1109/pac.1997.753072

The PS 40 MHz bunching cavity

2002· article· en· W2151834132 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Garoby, David G. Grier, E. Jensen, A.K. Mitra, R. Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersCERNTRIUMF
KeywordsVoltageAmplifierPhysicsBeam (structure)Capacitive sensingCoupling (piping)Adiabatic processMaterials scienceLinear particle acceleratorOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 40 MHz cavity has been designed and built at CERN as part of the preparation of the PS as injector for LHC. The cavity will provide the necessary bunch spacing of 25 ns prior to injection into SPS and subsequently LHC. The mechanical design of the copper coated steel cavity was dominated by space constraints in the PS tunnel and by vacuum requirements. The salient design features described are (i) tight, multipactor-free, capacitive coupling from the power amplifier, (ii) fast RF feedback, (iii) inductively coupled tuners, (iv) an efficient, pneumatically operated gap short-circuit. The operation cycle consists of an adiabatic capture up to 100 kV gap voltage, a non-adiabatic jump to 300 kV, and subsequent bunch rotation. The multipactor voltage level at the gap lies below the operating voltage range and is easily passed through. A fast RF feedback system with a total group delay of 220 ns copes with heavy beam loading (10/sup 11/ protons/bunch) and prevents unwanted interaction with other beams in the PS. The cavity has recently been installed, the nominal gap voltage of 300 kV has been attained, and bunch lengths below 8 ns have been achieved in first tests at nominal intensity. Experimental results are reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207