MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151889435

Transition from pediatric to adult health care for young adults with neurological disorders: parental perspectives.

2011· article· en· W2151889435 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Davies, Janet E. Rennick, Annette Majnemer

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYoung adultNonprobability samplingHealth carePsychologyAdult careQualitative researchVulnerability (computing)Developmental psychologyGrounded theoryMedicineNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: With advances in pediatric health care, many adolescents with complex chronic neurological conditions live well into adulthood. As such, the movement toward adult health care services is an expected and desired outcome of pediatric care. When the young adult has an intellectual impairment in addition to a complex chronic neurological condition, parental involvement is critical in the transition process, as these young adults are unable to make informed decisions independently and require significant guidance from caregivers. Thus, the transition process should address not only the direct health care needs of the young adult, but also the needs and concerns of the parents who are instrumental in guiding that process. The objective of this study was to identify salient issues confronting these parents. METHODS: A qualitative interpretive design was used to gain an in-depth understanding of parents'perceptions of their young adults' transition process from a pediatric to an adult health care setting. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method, in which interview data were simultaneously collected and analyzed throughout the data collection process. Purposive sampling was used to interview 17 parents of 11 young adults who had transitioned to an adult health care setting. RESULTS: Findings suggest that parents perceived a tremendous sense of abandonment from the heath care team during the transition process. They experienced a sense of loss, fear and uncertainty, as they navigated the transition of their young adult. Parents believed that what hindered the transition process was a lack of sufficient coordination within the health care system, the vulnerability of the young adult at the time of transition, the lack of appropriate resources in the adult health care system given the unique and multifaceted needs of the young adult, and their own tenuous health status. The transition process was felt to be facilitated by the parent's resourcefulness, family support and ability to establish new relationships within the adult health care setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided a greater understanding of parental perceptions of transition care for young adults with a complex chronic neurological disorder who have an intellectual impairment. The emotional toll on the parents is tremendous and requires thoughtful consideration when planning the transition process for these young adults. Although all parents acknowledged the hardships and adversity they faced during the process were immense, they all felt that with better guidance and improved resources, the experience for future families could be a positive and satisfying experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207