MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151900613 · doi:10.1517/14728222.10.4.533

Targeting invading macrophage- derived PGE<sub>2</sub>, IL-6 and calcitonin gene-related peptide in injured nerve to treat neuropathic pain

2006· review· en· W2151900613 on OpenAlexafffund
Weiya Ma, Rémi Quirion

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuropathic painMedicineNerve injuryDorsal root ganglionNociceptorDownregulation and upregulationCalcitonin gene-related peptideNociceptionNeuroscienceInflammationCalcitoninImmunologyPharmacologyNeuropeptideAnesthesiaInternal medicineReceptorBiologyAnatomyDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune and inflammatory responses occurring in an injured nerve have been generally believed to contribute to the generation and maintenance of neuropathic pain. In this review, the authors demonstrate the upregulation of COX-2/prostaglandin E2, IL-6 and calcitonin gene-related peptide in invading macrophages and discuss possible mechanisms involved in their upregulation and how they contribute to the maintenance of neuropathic pain. By acting on nociceptors in dorsal root ganglion and local inflammatory cells via autocrine or paracrine pathways, these inflammatory mediators facilitate spontaneous ectopic activity and sustain nociceptive responses, an important mechanism underlying both ongoing and evoked neuropathic pain state. Targeting these mediators in injured nerve may provide novel therapeutic avenues to more successfully treat nerve injury-associated neuropathic pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic TargetsSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207