MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151901300 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1578453

Frequency domain channel estimation for SC-FDE in UWB communications

2005· article· en· W2151901300 on OpenAlexaff
Yue Wang, Xiaodai Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSC-FDEEstimatorChannel (broadcasting)Frequency domainComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Ultra-widebandEqualization (audio)AlgorithmUpper and lower boundsMinimum mean square errorMean squared errorElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, single carrier block transmission with frequency domain equalization (SC-FDE) has been shown to be a promising candidate for ultra-wideband (UWB) communications. In this paper, we address the channel estimation problem for SC-FDE transmission over UWB channels. A mean square error (MSE) lower bound for the frequency domain LMMSE channel estimator is derived and the optimal pilot sequence that achieves this lower bound is obtained. Further simplification leads to a frequency domain channel estimator with reduced computational complexity. The performance of the simplified estimator for SC-FDE over UWB channels is evaluated and compared with that of perfect channel state information. The effects of non-optimal and optimal pilot symbols are also investigated. Our results show that the proposed frequency domain channel estimator performs well over UWB channels with only small performance degradation compared to the perfect channel estimation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.Same topicUltra-Wideband Communications TechnologyFrench-language works237,207