MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151911489 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2011.5937939

Dual VDD block based CMOS image sensor - preliminary evaluation

2011· article· en· W2151911489 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Gao, Orly Yadid-Pecht

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsBlock (permutation group theory)Image sensorCMOSPixelComputer sciencePower (physics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceImage qualityImage (mathematics)Electronic engineeringMathematicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An image sensor with dual power supply of 1.8V and 1.1V is proposed. The sensor works on blocks of 8×8 pixels and the power supply for each block is selected according to the estimated variance inside the block. For the blocks with large variance, 1.8V is chosen to achieve high imaging performance; otherwise, 1.1V is used to save power. Preliminary evaluation of the imager performance based on simulations for TSMC 0.18 μm CMOS technology is given. The estimated amount of power saved by the proposed imager varies from image to image. Theoretically, up to 37% of power can be saved for images with predominant background, while no noticeable quality degradation of the reconstructed pictures after compression and decompression is perceived (PSNR reduced by less than 1.5 dB).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207