MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151940355 · doi:10.1109/tac.2010.2049279

Stabilizability of Controlled Lagrangian Systems of Two Degrees of Freedom and One Degree of Under-Actuation by the Energy-Shaping Method

2010· article· en· W2151940355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Furuta pendulumExponential stabilityLyapunov functionMathematicsLagrangianCorollaryInverted pendulumBall (mathematics)PendulumEnergy (signal processing)Stability theoryDegree (music)Double pendulumApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisEngineeringControl (management)Nonlinear systemPhysicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide some criteria for stabilizability by the energy-shaping method for the class of all controlled Lagrangian systems of two degrees of freedom and one degree of under-actuation: a necessary and sufficient condition for Lyapunov stabilizability, two sufficient conditions for asymptotic stabilizability, and a necessary and sufficient condition for exponential stabilizability. As a corollary, we show that some of the asymptotically stabilizing controllers that were designed in old literatures with the energy-shaping method are actually exponentially stabilizing controllers. Examples of such systems are the inverted pendulum on a cart, the Furuta pendulum, the ball and beam system, and the Pendubot.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it