Fidaxomicin (OPT-80) for the treatment of<i>Clostridium difficile</i>infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become an increasingly important healthcare-associated complication in many countries. CDI outbreaks, a new 'hypervirulent' form and increased worldwide rates have underscored four urgent unmet needs for this disease: i) effective prevention of CDI; ii) therapies to produce faster resolution of CDI symptoms; iii) therapies to treat severe CDI more effectively and reduce its mortality; and iv) therapies to reduce the CDI recurrence rate following treatment. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: Fidaxomicin, a new macrocyclic antibiotic, has demonstrated potent in vitro activity against C. difficile with limited or no activity against normal fecal flora. It is minimally absorbed from the intestinal tract, even in the presence of intestinal inflammation. When tested against oral vancomycin in clinical studies of CDI therapy, it has equivalent efficacy for curing CDI at end of treatment and a comparable safety profile to that agent. However, fidaxomicin therapy of CDI is associated with significantly fewer CDI recurrences in the 28 days following treatment. Symptom resolution is also slightly quicker in some CDI patients. Additional fecal flora analysis in the CDI trials showed that fewer individuals developed intestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among the fidaxomicin-treated group. This new molecule, which has just completed two large Phase III multicenter studies, successfully addresses two of the four urgent and unmet needs for dealing with CDI. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Fidaxomicin is as effective and as safe as vancomycin therapy for treating CDI but is associated with far fewer recurrences post-treatment and a decreased risk of VRE acquisition. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Fidaxomicin is a potential new therapy for CDI which has the capacity to substantially decrease post-treatment recurrences and is as safe and well-tolerated as standard vancomycin treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".