MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151952082 · doi:10.1517/14656566.2010.485614

Fidaxomicin (OPT-80) for the treatment of<i>Clostridium difficile</i>infection

2010· review· en· W2151952082 on OpenAlexaff
Mark A. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFidaxomicinMedicineClostridium difficileInternal medicineVancomycinAntibioticsDiarrheaGastroenterologyIntensive care medicineSurgeryMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become an increasingly important healthcare-associated complication in many countries. CDI outbreaks, a new 'hypervirulent' form and increased worldwide rates have underscored four urgent unmet needs for this disease: i) effective prevention of CDI; ii) therapies to produce faster resolution of CDI symptoms; iii) therapies to treat severe CDI more effectively and reduce its mortality; and iv) therapies to reduce the CDI recurrence rate following treatment. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: Fidaxomicin, a new macrocyclic antibiotic, has demonstrated potent in vitro activity against C. difficile with limited or no activity against normal fecal flora. It is minimally absorbed from the intestinal tract, even in the presence of intestinal inflammation. When tested against oral vancomycin in clinical studies of CDI therapy, it has equivalent efficacy for curing CDI at end of treatment and a comparable safety profile to that agent. However, fidaxomicin therapy of CDI is associated with significantly fewer CDI recurrences in the 28 days following treatment. Symptom resolution is also slightly quicker in some CDI patients. Additional fecal flora analysis in the CDI trials showed that fewer individuals developed intestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among the fidaxomicin-treated group. This new molecule, which has just completed two large Phase III multicenter studies, successfully addresses two of the four urgent and unmet needs for dealing with CDI. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Fidaxomicin is as effective and as safe as vancomycin therapy for treating CDI but is associated with far fewer recurrences post-treatment and a decreased risk of VRE acquisition. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Fidaxomicin is a potential new therapy for CDI which has the capacity to substantially decrease post-treatment recurrences and is as safe and well-tolerated as standard vancomycin treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on PharmacotherapySame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207