Grassmannian beamforming for MIMO amplify-and-forward relaying
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of beamforming codebook design for limited feedback half-duplex multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) amplify-and-forward (AF) relay system. In the first part of the paper, the direct link between the source and the destination is ignored. Assuming perfect channel state information (CSI), we show that the source and the relay should map their signals to the dominant right singular vectors of the source-relay and relay-destination channels. For the limited feedback scenario, we prove the appropriateness of Grassmannian codebooks as the source and relay beamforming codebooks based on the distributions of the optimal source and relay beamforming vectors. In the second part of the paper, the direct link is considered in the problem model. Assuming perfect CSI, we derive the optimization problem that identifies the optimal source beamforming vector and show that the solution to this problem is uniformly distributed on the unit sphere for independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) Rayleigh channels. For the limited feedback scenario, we justify the appropriateness of Grassmannian codebooks for quantizing the optimal source beamforming vector based on its distribution. Finally, a modified quantization scheme is presented, which introduces a negligible penalty in the system performance but significantly reduces the required number of feedback bits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it