A Single Generalized Seizure Alters the Amplitude, but Not Phase, of the Circadian Activity Rhythm of the Hamster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
People with epilepsy exhibit high rates of sleep disturbances. In many cases, these sleep disruptions appear to be related to the occurrence of the seizures themselves. Changes in sleep structure may reflect underlying changes in the circadian clock, as circadian rhythms of locomotor activity, body temperature, and hormone release are disrupted following a seizure. The present study was designed to determine if a single generalized seizure could alter the phase and waveform of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running behavior in the Syrian hamster. Animals were housed in constant darkness, and were administered either a sham treatment or a maximal electroconvulsive shock at one of three time-points: 6 h before activity onset, 1 h after activity onset, or 6 h after activity onset. Seizures at all of these phases did not significantly affect the phase of the circadian activity rhythm. The circadian locomotor activity levels were significantly attenuated following seizures at all three phases. This attenuation was prominent over the 24 h following the seizure, and was also evident over the three post-seizure days. These data suggest that while seizures do not affect phase, they may alter the amplitude of the circadian clock. Because the amplitude of the circadian clock affects sleep quality, these findings suggest one mechanism by which persistent seizures may decrease the quality of sleep in patients with epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".