<scp>MHD</scp> flow of blood through a dually stenosed artery: Effects of viscosity variation, variable hematocrit and velocity‐slip
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Of concern in the paper is a study on blood flow through a porous segment of an artery subject to the action of an external magnetic field. Effects of viscosity variation and variable hematocrit as well as velocity‐slip at the arterial wall have been duly taken care of in the study. A model has been developed to perform the study by using the principles of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). The model has been analysed theoretically by employing suitable mathematical methods. Analytical expressions have been derived for the velocity, minute expenditure of blood (volumetric flow rate), wall shear stress and pressure gradient. The said physical variables are computed by using a specific set of values of the various parameters involved in the analysis. This serves as an illustration of the validity of the mathematical model developed in the paper. The computational results are presented graphically. The study also provides important insight into the effects of slip velocity on blood velocity, wall shear stress and pressure gradient. The study further shows that the flow of blood in a porous artery is significantly influenced by the action of an external magnetic field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it