MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152050692 · doi:10.23919/acc.2004.1384396

Characterization of the optimal disturbance attenuation for nonlinear stochastic partially observable uncertain systems

2004· article· en· W2152050692 on OpenAlexaff
C. Charalmbous, Fatemeh Rezaei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimaxAttenuationMeasure (data warehouse)Control theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemOptimal controlMathematical optimizationObservableConstraint (computer-aided design)MathematicsController (irrigation)Stochastic processStochastic controlParametric statisticsComputer scienceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with stochastic optimal control systems, in which uncertainty is described by a relative entropy constraint between the nominal measure and the uncertain measure, while the pay-off is a functional of the uncertain measure. This is a minimax game, equivalent to the H/sup /spl infin// optimal disturbance attenuation problem, in which the controller seeks to minimize the pay-off, while the disturbance described by a set of measures aims at maximizing the pay-off. The objective of this paper is to apply the results of the abstract formulation to stochastic uncertain systems, in which the nominal and uncertain systems are described by conditional distributions. The results obtained include existence of the optimal control policy, explicit computation of the worst case conditional measure, and characterization of the optimal disturbance attenuation, for nonlinear partially observable systems. The linear case is presented to illustrate the concepts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207