Advances in neurological education: A time to share
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurological education in medical schools and residency programs has changed dramatically over the past decade. New mandates from regulatory agencies, such as the Liaison Committee for Medial Education (LCME), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), have had a profound effect on curriculum and evaluation of medical students and residents. In addition, major initiatives in neurological education by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), the American Neurological Association (ANA), and the Association of University Professor of Neurology (AUPN) have also had an impact on Neurology curricula in medical schools and residency programs, with one goal being the recruitment and retention of high-quality US medical students in Neurology residency training programs. One of the responses of the medical profession to concerns over the delivery of health care has been to tighten the requirements for medical student education, residency education, and physician education. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has established six core competencies (medical knowledge, patient care, professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice) that all residents must master to complete residency training.1, 2 In addition, the Residency Review Committees will be focusing on outcomes rather than process when evaluating residency training programs.2 The Residency Review Committees have previously evaluated whether residency programs have the potential to educate residents in a specialty by focusing on curriculum, number of faculty, number of patients, variety of conferences, and so forth. In the future, they will focus on whether residency programs are actually teaching the residents, by evaluating performance of these residents in practice. Concerns for patient safety have resulted in limits on work hours for residents.3-7 Lastly, medical schools and residency programs are placing new emphasis on evidence-based medicine and cost-effective health care as possible solutions to the tensions resulting from rising medical costs, advancing technology, and the need to improve medical education.8 The following three sections consider advances in neurological education for medical students, restructuring residency training in Neurology, and teaching Neurology residents how to enter the workforce. In this section, Ralph Józefowicz, MD, Neurology Residency Program Director, Neurology Clerkship Director, and Neural Science Course Director at the University of Rochester, discusses new developments in medical student training. Teaching neural sciences and neurology to medical students has changed significantly over the past 10 years. This section discusses changes in preclinical neural science teaching; changes in the Neurology clerkship; efforts of the AAN, ANA, and AUPN to increase student interest in Neurology; and future directions in neurological education. More and more medical schools are teaching the neural sciences in an interdepartmental course. Not only are neuroanatomy and neurophysiology being taught concurrently in these courses, but at some medical schools, neuropharmacology and neuropathology are being integrated as well. A small number of schools have also integrated psychopathology into a supercourse that teaches brain and cognitive sciences. The main advantage of such integration is that clinical relevance becomes immediately apparent to the students.9 For example, when structure and function of the basal ganglia are taught, appropriate clinical faculty can discuss the neurological and psychiatric diseases that result from dysfunction of the basal ganglia. Recently, the AAN and the Association of Medical School Neuroscience Department Chairs have formed a task force to develop a core curriculum for these integrated neural science courses. In addition to changes in curriculum, methods of instruction are also changing in medical schools. Small-group, problem-based learning formats have replaced some of the lectures in medical school as a way to engage students in active learning and problem solving. Integrated neural science courses are ideal courses for including problem-based learning formats, given the frequency with which psychiatric and neurological disease coexist in the real world. Another enhancement in basic neural science teaching has been the incorporation of neuroimaging into traditional neuroanatomy and neuropathology laboratories. In many medical schools, interpretation of brain computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is taught concurrently with cross-sectional neuroanatomy in these laboratories. Only 80% of medical schools require clinical experience in Neurology, and in many of these schools, the experience is only 2 weeks and occurs during the fourth year.10 The primary reason for this is the Liaison Committee for Medial Education standard ED-15, which states “The curriculum should include clinical experiences in Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, and Surgery.” Neurology is not mentioned as a requirement. That said, the AAN, ANA, and AUPN are joining forces to make Neurology a requirement in medical school curricula. In 2000, the AAN Consortium of Neurology Clerkship Directors published core curriculum guidelines for the Neurology clerkship to help medical schools standardize the teaching of neurology to their medical students.11 These guidelines may be found on the AAN Web site (www.aan.com). The Liaison Committee for Medial Education is also requiring that each clerkship define specific diagnoses and conditions that students must see during their clerkship experience, as well as student level of involvement for these patients (observe, examine, or manage). For Neurology clerkships that are only 2 weeks, meeting these specifications will be a challenge. Integration of clinical clerkships is yet another trend in medical schools, and in certain medical schools, the Psychiatry and Neurology clerkships have been merged. In some of these schools, the integration is minimal and primarily consists of several joint conferences. In others, the integration is more complete. In 2004, the AAN Consortium of Neurology Clerkship Directors and the Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry issued a joint statement concerning integrated Neurology and Psychiatry clerkships. Specifically, both organizations reaffirmed the unique nature of each specialty with respect to the diseases that are seen and the approach to the patient, and they urged caution in the design of such conjoined clerkships. The 1990s saw a dramatic decline in the number of US medical students entering Neurology residencies. As a result, the AAN, ANA, and AUPN developed programs to increase interest in neurology among US medical students. Student Interest Group in Neurology (SIGN): The AAN has actively promoted the formation of SIGN groups in all US and Canadian medical schools. Currently, there are more than 143 SIGN chapters exist. SIGN activities include lunch or dinner meetings with Neurology faculty and residents, community outreach programs, shadowing programs with Neurology residents, as well as publication of a SIGN newsletter. AAN Medical Student Prize for Excellence in Neurology: Each neurology department may nominate one graduating medical student for this award, which is typically given at graduation. Medical Student Summer Research Scholarship: Up to 20 scholarships are awarded to first- or second-year medical students to support a summer research project. Medical Student Scholarship to the Annual Meeting: These scholarships provide travel support for medical students to attend the AAN Annual Meeting. Minority Scholars Program: This comprehensive program provides travel scholarships for minority students to attend the AAN Annual Meeting, travel stipends for these students to participate in Neurology clerkships at institutions outside of their own, and honoraria for faculty to speak at minority medical schools. Clinical Neuroscience Pathway: This program encourages neurology departments to establish enriched curricula for medical students interested in neurology as an academic career. ANA Academic Neurology Teaching Scholarship: These fellowships provide junior faculty members with a 2-month mentored fellowship in teaching skills and curriculum design. John N. Whitaker Visiting Professorships: This program provides five awards annually to fund a visit by a senior neurologist to interact with medical students, both formally and informally, to increase their interest in neurology as an academic career. AUPN Recruitment Prize: Two prizes are awarded annually to Neurology departments for recruiting the largest number of medical students into Neurology residencies. Future directions in neurological education for medical students will likely focus on evaluation techniques. Because testing drives the curriculum, developing evaluation techniques that stress outcomes will likely result in positive curricular change. Current evaluation techniques rely heavily on multiple-choice questions, which are excellent at testing knowledge and application of knowledge.12 Skills and attitudes, arguably as important as knowledge for physicians, cannot be tested using the multiple-choice question format and require other methods of evaluation. Objective-structured clinical examinations using standardized patients are used in many medical schools as part of a comprehensive examination or a clerkship examination, and all six core competencies can be evaluated through an objective-structured clinical examination. These examinations consume a significant amount of faculty time and effort, require a significant amount of clinical space, and are costly to mount. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) now requires all medical students to take and pass a clinical skills examination that uses an objective-structured clinical examination format with standardized patients at ten stations. The unanswered question is whether physician performance will improve as a result. In this section, Steven Galetta, MD, Neurology Residency Program Director at the University of Pennsylvania, discusses new developments in residency training. We are witnessing major transformations in Neurology residency training in response to rapid advances in the field of neurology and to external regulatory demands. The AAN has defined the essentials of Neurology residency training and has developed a curriculum centered on the core competencies. In response to these changes, programs have developed new methods and modalities of teaching, procedures for evaluation, and rotations to expand clinical training. Perhaps the greatest challenge for program directors over the past decade has been structuring clinical training so that it encompasses the explosion in subspecialty neurology. Clinic experiences traditionally have provided residents with exposure to a wide variety of neurological conditions. Popular methods have included sending residents to work in a group practice staffed by attending physicians on a rotating basis. This setting often includes full-time academic physicians mixed with private practice neurologists to provide the residents with a broad perspective on treatment options. For large patient populations such as those with epilepsy, subspecialty days can be arranged and staffed by appropriate subspecialists. Several programs use the “firm system” in which groups of residents are assigned to groups of faculty members for the duration of their training. Whereas in this format residents have the advantage of providing longitudinal care, exposure to a limited number of attending physicians may impart a narrow perspective. Alternative arrangements include clinics in which residents rotate through a different specialty area every day. This type of rotation is particularly helpful for junior residents who are trying to choose a specialty area for subsequent training. Other clinic models have each resident linked to a specific attending physician on a weekly or monthly basis. Most programs have developed outpatient subspecialty groups to offer residents the diverse clinical experience necessary for comprehensive preparation for practice. TheUniversity of Pennsylvania (PENN) has created 1-month rotations in neuroophthalmology, movement disorders, cognitive neurology, multiple sclerosis, stroke, epilepsy, neurooncology, and neuromuscular disease. Residents attend the clinic daily and evaluate both new and follow-up patients to gain a longitudinal perspective of the subspecialty. In addition to the traditional neuropathology rotation, neuroradiology and interventional neurology are now also offered as electives. Other institutions, such as Johns Hopkins University and New York University, have developed combined training programs in neurology and radiology as the field of interventional neurology continues to expand. There also has been a rising demand for exposure to urgent neurological care and to outpatient neurology. In response, PENN created an ambulatory emergency service. The service is staffed by a senior resident who answers calls from outpatient services requesting immediate neurological evaluations. This rotation provides residents with an opportunity to field calls from referring physicians and patients and to assess the urgency of a variety of neurological problems. Follow-up care is provided by residents in their clinics and supervised by members of full-time and associate faculty. As neurologists assume increasing primary care of patients with serious problems, such as stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, encephalitis, there is a corresponding need for residents to acquire greater intensive care unit experience. This move toward neuro-intensive care training corresponds with dramatic advances in stroke, neuroimaging, intensive care unit medicine, and neurological therapeutics. Such programs will need to be staffed with physicians specialized in neuro-intensive care to address the rising demand for this type of training. Because a great deal of clinical experience is necessary to pack into any one residency program, and considerable specialized expertise may be difficult to find in any one setting, we are seeing a number of fruitful partnerships develop. PENN and Johns Hopkins University, for example, have developed a formal partnership to facilitate exchange of elective rotations between programs. Residents are offered the option of taking 1-month electives sponsored by the primary program. Our two training programs also hold a joint annual research conference to expose residents to a broader array of potential mentors. Some programs offer specialized training to residents outside of their institution. A rotation in multiple sclerosis is available at the University of Texas-Southwestern, and an epilepsy program at Wake Forest University has been offered for many years.13, 14 Several sponsors, including pharmaceutical companies, the AAN, and others, provide external funding for prolonged visiting professorships. The Mayo Clinic and University of Colorado sponsor visiting professorships that last for several days. Such interactions enhance resident exposure to a wider variety of material and diversity of viewpoints. International exchange is another mechanism by which residency training may be enhanced. Several global neurological outreach programs have been initiated by large US institutions to improve health care delivery and education in both developed and underdeveloped countries. PENN has partnered with Botswana to provide clinical care across a variety of specialties. Senior Neurology residents may elect to do 4- to 6-week rotations at the Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone, Botswana, supervised by full-time PENN Department of Medicine faculty. In this setting, they serve as one of just a few neurological providers in the entire country. Residents are exposed to large numbers of patients with neurological disorders that are common to Botswana including tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and cryptococcal meningitis. Faculty and medical students from PENN rotate alongside the Neurology resident. The University of Rochester (UR) has partnered with Jagiellonian University College of Medicine in to improve neurological education at that institution. Senior Neurology residents travel to for a each to neurology to medical students and gain experience in small and on this The residents are supervised by a senior Neurology faculty and medical students by teaching examination and skills to the students. Medical education has from a variety of The has been by many programs to exposure to A variety of have created Web so that residents and other can material Several AAN programs are available for and PENN has the into weekly resident The AAN has also developed practice which may be into a conference teaching programs are available from subspecialty on such as epilepsy, and The Web site provides an of and Other institutions have developed of material with such as movement and a for neuromuscular A of available Web for neurology and may also be found at The of medical on the has medical education. it the need to residents on how to the of Recently, has been toward of a research curriculum to the residents the basic of and methods of clinical this has been the Research Program the academic we residents how to a research and a We how to evaluate medical and how to such into clinical practice. In this program, residents are to with a faculty one meeting This approach residents to a variety of potential from those in practice and to those who clinical and basic the of their we residents to have one research and to have formal clinical or basic research the entire faculty. may be as as a and of the or as as This curriculum has been to residents of their of career. of residents have used this experience to for external funding support or to their specialty We find this curriculum to be an way to and to the of a clinical or research programs offer elective time so that a resident may several in the some programs offer training for those residents who preparation for an academic career. a program is of medicine, the resident a in clinical neurology. The of training are to clinical training to complete Board requirements and to for at 2 of experience. The has the of a research for Neurology residency The goal of this new is to training programs to more neurologists for a in clinical or The program in residency training and of experience in the and fourth years. is a fellowship during which the will complete a research and for a The of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical six core competencies in neurology has not only changes in how we define methods of but also changes in evaluation In response, the AAN has developed a curriculum on the six core The has the of to be taught and has the also has the of created available for education, and possible methods of evaluation. Because of the emphasis on interpersonal communication skills, must attending physicians, and patients to evaluate the and these are and in an to a of the communication In addition, assess outpatient for a longitudinal in education, three lectures on the of a clinical we an annual examination to the examination by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology as part of Residents neurological and examinations on new A of to residents serve as the for of the diagnoses and of neurological problems. are created and with residents. Other programs patient examinations in which a residency may be evaluated using the patient The main of such programs are their and of among the residents. A of and material is by the American Association of Medical The is an American Association of Medical Web site that a of material by the core The from residents in response to the new changes has been that they are a wider variety of their training can an future in which their specialty has from one that to one that dramatic new options. each in the practice of neurology, residency training will have to The provides a that rapid exchange of material between training programs, the AAN, the ANA, and subspecialty In this section, MD, discusses the addition of curriculum in Neurology residency programs. who have their whether entering private practice or are with an immediate need to the of health a knowledge of practice physicians find to the during medical school and residency training have time for the need for such practice a few programs have to basic into their curricula. are some of how they are The Neurology Department at University has developed a practice that is offered to residents during monthly lunch This by MD, multiple and calls from residents who had to of how to a with and with into it that programs on the often to be as The resulting by both faculty and residents, includes lectures on practice and a the program neurologists to in a by the The program has and is to in The Medical College of has created a by the Director of the Medical College of Neuroscience the is to provide core competencies in and to establish knowledge for The program includes sections on physician and regulatory private practice and 2 the has for neurology, and is on a to provide residents with the of the program at their includes a of multiple-choice and each the Neurology Residency Program at University, the of neurology is into core These lectures are given by MD, with one of the The neurophysiology for example, includes specific lectures that focus on and The residents also attend a by the on Residents discuss and on the and attending these into daily clinical daily The a of the neurological examination, and their include of new patient and follow-up clinic This program has into the and for each clinical other an outside who is a is to an on material to the These include lectures on and and These programs, using emphasis and to address the of and that the resident who the of academic medical to enter private practice. there are and and and difficult of a decade that provide this for residents have been by In response to an of the of the AAN Residency will for the in practice into the section on Neurological education has dramatically changed over the past decade. These changes have those of medical of training programs, and of physicians and between neurology training programs, regulatory agencies, the AAN, the ANA, and the AUPN has resulted in major curriculum changes for both medical students and Neurology residents. New emphasis has been on the methods of clinical and The provides an for training programs to a variety of teaching and medical student and residency training programs will need to the of basic and with the clinical skills that are necessary to the A difficult with between the delivery of patient care, and the dramatic advances in in the methods of neurological education will on a We it is time to We the help of and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".