MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152102551 · doi:10.7202/043936ar

Analyse de la trajectoire historique de la monnaie électronique

2005· article· fr· W2152102551 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le développement de l’argent et des mécanismes de paiement est d’abord apparu par la création du troc, lequel a engendré la monnaie métallique, qui a donné naissance à la monnaie papier pour être graduellement remplacée par la monnaie électronique. À chacune de ces étapes, le degré d’acceptation de la monnaie est tributaire de la confiance qu’expriment les agents économiques. Cette confiance peut émaner du marché, mais elle se manifeste surtout lors d’une émission par une autorité publique. Bien que ce profil de développement apparaisse à chacune des étapes du développement de la monnaie, il est plus marqué dans l’évolution de la monnaie papier et de la monnaie électronique. L’étude qui suit présente une description des origines de la monnaie électronique et analyse le phénomène de l’évolution de cette monnaie en vue de comprendre et d’envisager la trajectoire que devrait prendre le paiement par Internet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it