MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152114071 · doi:10.1109/tbc.2012.2190192

An Economical, ISI-Immune Frequency Offset Estimator for DOCSIS Upstream Channels

2012· article· en· W2152114071 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Berscheid, Eric Salt, Ha H. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreambleEstimatorFrequency offsetBroadbandOffset (computer science)Cramér–Rao boundElectronic engineeringUpstream (networking)Computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEstimation theoryOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the design and implementation of frequency offset estimation algorithms for DOCSIS upstream channels. A cost-effective estimator which approaches the Cramer-Rao bound for high SNRs is derived. The effect of ISI generated by upstream micro-reflections in typical cable networks is considered, and a condition upon the transmitted preamble sequence which guarantees unbiased estimation is presented. It is shown that the proposed estimator is unbiased for a wide range of preamble sequences, which is generally not the case for burst frequency estimators. This flexibility may be utilized by selecting a broadband preamble which is suitable for performing channel estimation and frequency offset estimation simultaneously, thereby increasing the efficiency of the upstream channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on BroadcastingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207