MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152119035 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v48i3.54930

Artful Portrayals in Qualitative Inquiry: The Road to Found Poetry and Beyond

2002· article· en· W2152119035 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lynn Butler-Kisber

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryHumanitiesExposition (narrative)EthnologyArtSociologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, l'auteur examine le contexte actuel qui voit la multiplication des enquetes qualitatives basees sur l'art de la litterature et retrace son itineraire personnel dans le domaine de la pedagogie s'y referant en precisant sa methodologie par l'exposition d'exemples utilisant la poesie et de suggestions concernant la maniere de conduire ce type de recherches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.124
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.185
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1240.185
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0150.096
Scholarly communication0.0300.030
Open science0.0040.023
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.270
GPT teacher head0.578
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations214
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207