Géographies tranquilles du quotidien. Une analyse de la contribution des sciences sociales et de la géographie à l’étude des pratiques spatiales.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Engendré et reproduit au quotidien par les pratiques spatiales et par l'interaction des acteurs sociaux, le territoire ne se réduit pas à un espace politique ou à une représentation idéologique. Pour expliquer la genèse territoriale, pour comprendre sa double nature objective et cognitive, réelle et représentée (symbolique aussi), cet article s'attache d'abord à décrire — par l'analyse de la contribution des sociologues, des anthropologues et des géographes — la véritable nature des pratiques spatiales qui le construisent. Il analyse ensuite de quelle façon elles affrontent, tout en le produisant, le contexte des systèmes sociospatiaux. Il étudie enfin comment, au prix d'une ruse permanente à l'égard de ces systèmes, les individus s'affirment les producteurs compétents de l'espace géographique et de ses territoires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".