Friction-Induced Vibration in Lead Screw Systems: Mathematical Modeling and Experimental Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lead screw mechanisms are used to convert rotary to linear motion. The velocity-dependent coefficient of friction at the contact between lead screw and nut threads can lead to self-excited vibrations, which may result in excessive noise generated by the system. In this paper, based on a practical example of a powered automotive seat adjuster, the nonlinear dynamics of lead screw systems is studied. A test setup is developed to perform experiments on the horizontal motion drive. The experimental results are used in a novel two-step identification approach to estimate friction, damping, and stiffness parameters of the system. The identified parameters together with other known system parameters are used in the numerical simulations. The accuracy of the mathematical model is validated by comparing numerical simulation results with actual measurements in cases where limit cycles are developed. Using simulation results for a range of lead screw angular velocities and axial forces, regions of stability were found. Also, the effects of damping and stiffness parameters on the steady-state amplitude of vibration were investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it