MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152182810 · doi:10.1109/tro.2004.839219

On adaptive synchronization control of coordinated multirobots with flexible/rigid constraints

2005· article· en· W2152182810 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotControl theory (sociology)Synchronization (alternating current)Dual (grammatical number)Computer scienceAdaptive controlControl engineeringRobot end effectorExtension (predicate logic)Robot kinematicsFunction (biology)Decentralised systemControl (management)EngineeringMobile robotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In assembly tasks performed by coordinated multiple robots, the contact force at the end-effector of each robot should be a function of the states of all the robots, and further be a function of the control inputs when subject to rigid constraints. After a discussion on the algebraic loop issue caused by using direct force cancellation, an adaptive synchronization control algorithm is proposed in this paper, which particularly addresses the dual-arm case subject to both flexible and rigid constraints. Extension of the result to the multiple-arm case is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it