Fabrication and optical characterization of template-constructed thin films with chiral nanostructure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the fabrication of thin films perforated by high aspect ratio helical or chevron pores by an extension of the glancing angle deposition (GLAD) technique. The perforated films were created by transferring the nanostructure of a GLAD template film into target materials such as polymers and spin-on-glasses and subsequently removing the template. The pore shapes are shown to be highly controllable and films designed to suit particular applications are discussed. By a double templating technique, we replicate the structure of the original film using alternate materials, which are typically less suited to the unmodified GLAD technique. Helical films of Cu and Ni were created by this method and the process should be transferable to additional electrodeposited materials. The optical rotatory power of perforated thin films formed on glass substrates was characterized and perforated films were shown to be effective in rotating the polarization plane of linearly polarized incident light by as much as 1.4/spl deg///spl mu/m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it