MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152246113 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450820214

Measurement and Prediction of the Solubility of Stearic Acid Polymorphs by the UNIQUAC Equation

2004· article· en· W2152246113 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mahmoud Mirmehrabi, Sohrab Rohani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystallization and Solubility Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUNIQUACSolubilityStearic acidChemistrySolventThermodynamicsGravimetric analysisOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionNon-random two-liquid modelActivity coefficient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The solubility of stearic acid polymorphs B and C in methanol, 2‐butanone, decane and hexane was measured using a precise gravimetric method. Stearic acid is a molecule with 18 carbons that is highly nonideal in solutions and experimental data show strong deviations from the solubility prediction for ideal systems. It is soluble in both polar and nonpolar organic solvents. From experimental solubility, data the solvent mediated polymorphic transition temperature was found around 30°C. From thermal analysis, temperature and heat of transition from form B to form C and also heat of fusion of form C were found to be 49°C, 20 J/g and 240 J/g, respectively. From experimental solubility data the binary parameters of the universal quasi‐chemical (UNIQUAC) model, for stearic acid were calculated. The UNIQUAC solubility predictions compared very closely with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCrystallization and Solubility StudiesFrench-language works237,207