MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152301475 · doi:10.1109/isie.2006.295661

Three Phase Grid Connected Converter with an Efficient Power Flow Control Algorithm: Experimental Validation

2006· article· en· W2152301475 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Thibault, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Louis‐A. Dessaint

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesCanada Research ChairsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Reference frameGridRotating reference frameThree-phaseStationary Reference FramePulse-width modulationComputer scienceController (irrigation)Power (physics)VoltageFrame (networking)MathematicsEngineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the modeling, simulation and experimental validation of a sinusoidal internal model regulator. The algorithm is used to control a three-phase PWM voltage source bidirectional power flow converter connected to the grid. This new and simpler control technique solves the problem of PI regulation without the burden of transforming time-dependent three-phase quantities into the time invariant d-q reference frame and vice versa. This new control structure is based on a complex controller (i.e. with real and imaginary parts), which achieves zero steady-state error by controlling the current space vector directly in the stationary d-q reference frame. The mathematical equivalence with field-oriented control is fully demonstrated. Simulation and experimental results for both steady state and transient operating modes are also presented. Results clearly show the indistinguishability of the two control systems

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207