MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152322132 · doi:10.1109/icdm.2006.139

Searching for Pattern Rules

2006· article· en· W2152322132 on OpenAlexaff
Guichong Li, Howard J. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSuffix treeData miningTraverseComputationSet (abstract data type)Association rule learningMetric (unit)SuffixAlgorithmArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Data structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We address the problem of finding a set of pattern rules, from a transaction dataset given a statistical metric. A new data structure, called an incrementally counting suffix tree (ICST), is proposed for online computation of estimates of the support of any pattern or itemset. Using an ICST, our approach directly generates a set of pattern rules by a single scan of the whole dataset in partitions without the generation of frequent itemsets. Non-redundant rules can be found by removing redundancies from the pattern rules. The PPMCR algorithm first finds pattern rules and then non-redundant rules by generating valid candidates while traversing the ICST. Experimental results show that the PPMCR algorithm can be used for efficiently mining fewer non-redundant rules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207