MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152331615 · doi:10.1192/pb.bp.110.030627

‘Gentlemen, we have no money therefore we must think’ – mental health services in hard times

2011· article· en· W2152331615 on OpenAlexaff
Frank Holloway

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Psychiatrist · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychiatric care and mental health services
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthOrder (exchange)Public relationsMental healthcareBusinessPsychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatryFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In common with all elements of public services, mental healthcare in England faces a troubling and uncertain future. Two things, however, are certain: demographic trends ensure that demand will rise and harsh economic realities dictate that resources will in real terms shrink. In order to cope with these challenges, commissioners and providers will have to review very critically all aspects of the mental health system, including those that are currently fashionable. There is a need to identify and promote activities that are evidence-based and effective and to jettison practices and services that lack an evidence base.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe PsychiatristSame topicPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFrench-language works237,207