Effect of microwave radiation on the processing of a Cu‐Ni sulphide ore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The need for fine grinding to liberate valuable minerals from low‐grade ores has become a major concern due to the high energy requirements and low energy efficiencies of comminution processes. One method being studied to improve efficiencies is microwave pre‐treatment. Microwaves can selectively heat certain minerals (absorbers) within an ore, causing internal stresses and forming fractures along grain boundaries. Microwave pre‐treatment of an ore containing microwave‐absorbing minerals and microwave‐transparent gangue can significantly reduce grinding energy. However, these improvements must not be detrimental to downstream processing. This work investigated the effects of microwave radiation on the grindability and flotability of a copper/nickel sulphide ore. A reduction in the Bond Work Index of 22 % was observed after microwave pre‐treatment in a 3.0 kW multimodal microwave (2.45 GHz) for 60 s. Although a significant reduction in the required grinding energy was observed, the amount of energy required to treat the sample is significantly higher than the corresponding Bond Work Index reduction, indicating that the process remains some distance from being economically viable. Microwave pre‐treatment also showed beneficial effects on the flotation of the ore. Copper recovery remained constant while nickel recovery increased by 33.6 % after 120 s of microwave exposure at 0.8 kW, and by 34.4 % after a 30 s exposure at 3.0 kW. Higher microwave exposure also showed an increase in concentrate grade and flotation kinetics of both copper and nickel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".