MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152360129 · doi:10.18357/ijih31200612304

Community and Culture as Foundations for Resilience: Participatory Health Research with First Nations Student Filmmakers

2006· article· en· W2152360129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Indigenous Health · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticipatory action researchSociologyCitizen journalismAction researchPlan (archaeology)Presentation (obstetrics)PhotovoiceParticipatory culturePsychological resilienceCommunity-based participatory researchPublic relationsAction planPedagogyMedia studiesPsychologyPolitical scienceEcologyGeographyEconomic growthMedicineSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a participatory action research project that brings together teachers and students from three First Nations education programs with researchers from the Centre for Youth & Society at the University of Victoria for the purpose of researching health and wellness among Aboriginal youth.Using the methodologies of participatory research, students identify topics that are of concern to them in the area of health and wellness.They plan, research and develop a video presentation on their chosen topic using digital video as a tool for research and communication of their findings.This article focuses on how such an approach to research contributes to building resiliency through the development of relationships that foster a connection with community and culture.The article describes the way the project has enhanced participants’ relationships with their communities, across generations, with diverse groups in urban settings, and with their sense of self, and culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.664
GPT teacher head0.706
Teacher spread0.042 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it