MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152387463 · doi:10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013

Analysis of present day and future OH and methane lifetime in the ACCMIP simulations

2013· article· en· W2152387463 on OpenAlexafffund
Apostolos Voulgarakis, Vaishali Naïk, Jean‐François Lamarque, Drew Shindell, Paul J. Young, Michael J. Prather, Oliver Wild, Robert D. Field, D. Bergmann, Philip Cameron‐Smith, Irene Cionni, W. J. Collins, S. B. Dalsøren, Ruth M. Doherty, Veronika Eyring, G. Faluvegi, Gerd Folberth, Larry W. Horowitz, Béatrice Josse, Ian A. MacKenzie, T. Nagashima, David A. Plummer, Mattia Righi, Steven T. Rumbold, David S. Stevenson, Sarah A. Strode, Kengo Sudo, Sophie Szopa, Guang Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryLeibniz-RechenzentrumLeibniz-GemeinschaftGrand Équipement National De Calcul IntensifInstitut National Du CancerScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research CollaborationNorges ForskningsrådLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSight Research UKDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK GovernmentCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric ResearchNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDeutsches KlimarechenzentrumU.S. Department of EnergyNatural Environment Research CouncilNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMethaneRadiative forcingTroposphereAtmospheric sciencesRepresentative Concentration PathwaysEnvironmental scienceForcing (mathematics)OzoneGreenhouse gasTropospheric ozoneClimatologyRadiative transferPhotodissociationRange (aeronautics)Climate modelClimate changeChemistryMeteorologyPhotochemistryPhysicsAerosolMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Results from simulations performed for the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Modeling Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) are analysed to examine how OH and methane lifetime may change from present day to the future, under different climate and emissions scenarios. Present day (2000) mean tropospheric chemical lifetime derived from the ACCMIP multi-model mean is 9.8 ± 1.6 yr (9.3 ± 0.9 yr when only including selected models), lower than a recent observationally-based estimate, but with a similar range to previous multi-model estimates. Future model projections are based on the four Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), and the results also exhibit a large range. Decreases in global methane lifetime of 4.5 ± 9.1% are simulated for the scenario with lowest radiative forcing by 2100 (RCP 2.6), while increases of 8.5 ± 10.4% are simulated for the scenario with highest radiative forcing (RCP 8.5). In this scenario, the key driver of the evolution of OH and methane lifetime is methane itself, since its concentration more than doubles by 2100 and it consumes much of the OH that exists in the troposphere. Stratospheric ozone recovery, which drives tropospheric OH decreases through photolysis modifications, also plays a partial role. In the other scenarios, where methane changes are less drastic, the interplay between various competing drivers leads to smaller and more diverse OH and methane lifetime responses, which are difficult to attribute. For all scenarios, regional OH changes are even more variable, with the most robust feature being the large decreases over the remote oceans in RCP8.5. Through a regression analysis, we suggest that differences in emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds and in the simulation of photolysis rates may be the main factors causing the differences in simulated present day OH and methane lifetime. Diversity in predicted changes between present day and future OH was found to be associated more strongly with differences in modelled temperature and stratospheric ozone changes. Finally, through perturbation experiments we calculated an OH feedback factor (F) of 1.24 from present day conditions (1.50 from 2100 RCP8.5 conditions) and a climate feedback on methane lifetime of 0.33 ± 0.13 yr K−1, on average. Models that did not include interactive stratospheric ozone effects on photolysis showed a stronger sensitivity to climate, as they did not account for negative effects of climate-driven stratospheric ozone recovery on tropospheric OH, which would have partly offset the overall OH/methane lifetime response to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations376
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207