MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152399237 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2006.377303

A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for the Existence of a LTI Stabilizing Decentralized Overlapping Controller

2006· article· en· W2152399237 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Lavaei, Amir G. Aghdam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)LTI system theoryController (irrigation)Quadratic equationLinear systemDecentralised systemStability (learning theory)MathematicsOptimal controlComputer scienceMathematical optimizationControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the stability of the large-scale interconnected systems with a constrained control structure. It is assumed that the information flow matrix for the interconnected control system is given. This matrix determines which outputs of the system are available for constructing any input signal of the system. The notion of decentralized overlapping fixed mode (DOFM) is introduced, and it is shown that those modes of the system which are not DOFM, can be freely placed anywhere in the complex plane, by means of a linear time-invariant (LTI) structurally constrained controller. This implies that the system is stabilizable by a LTI structurally constrained controller, if and only if it does not have any unstable DOFM. Furthermore, a design procedure is proposed to obtain a stabilizing controller for the systems with no unstable DOFM. In addition, the problem of optimal LTI structurally constrained control design with respect to a quadratic performance index is discussed. The numerical examples given demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207