MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152408330 · doi:10.1109/ted.2008.2011679

Influence of Channel Stoichiometry on Zinc Indium Oxide Thin-Film Transistor Performance

2009· article· en· W2152408330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStoichiometryAnnealing (glass)TransistorMaterials scienceThin-film transistorZincIndiumSputteringOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Threshold voltageThin filmSubthreshold conductionOxideSemiconductorSubthreshold slopeVoltageNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyLayer (electronics)Physical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin-film transistors using a semiconductor of the form (ZnO)x( In2O3)1- x were fabricated via combinatorial RF sputtering. Stoichiometries varied from x=0.5 to x=1. Two sets of devices were annealed under oxygen at 300degC and 600degC, with another left as deposited. Devices fabricated with a zinc oxide fraction of 0.67plusmn0.02 were found to exhibit the highest mobilities of 35 cm2/Vmiddots for 300degC annealing conditions. Peak performance was found for x=0.75plusmn0.02, which yielded near-zero turn-on voltages, inverse subthreshold slopes of 0.3 V/dec, and on/off ratios up to 109.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it