AQuA: aggregated queueing algorithm for CDMA2000 base station controll
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing need for enhanced data services in cellular networks requires sharing of scarce wireless channel resources among the mobile users by dynamic channel assignments. It has been shown in previous works that such a scheme causes queue management problems in the buffers shared by multiple mobiles, e.g. the input buffer at base station controller (BSC), when their rates are increased after a period of lower aggregate data rate in radio links. Traditionally buffer management techniques like random early detection (RED) are used for a single buffer only. In this paper, we extend the RED algorithm to an aggregated queueing algorithm (AQuA) that simultaneously regulates the queueing discipline in both the shared and individual link buffers so that buffer overflow problems after aggregate link rate increase do not occur. Our algorithm relies on standard information on queueing backlog in link buffers available at BSC to perform buffer management in a unified manner with shared buffer. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our approach provides significantly greater determinism in packet transit delays over BSC and greater throughputs and similar levels of fairness as RED mechanism in shared buffers in conjunction with unregulated link buffers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it