MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Role of Mass Transfer in Removal of Cross-Linked Sacrificial Layers in 3DI Applications

2014· article· en· W2152427310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomena · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePassivationWaferPhotoresistThermal copper pillar bumpNanotechnologySolderingMicroelectronicsLayer (electronics)Composite materialFlip chipAdhesive

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demand for higher functionality in smaller form-factor electronic devices continues to grow. This growth is enabled in large part by wafer-scale packaging technologies for 2-D, 2.5-D, and 3-D integration. Solder bump, copper pillar, and TSV processes are key enablers for advanced packaging. Sacrificial polymer materials such as photoresist and polyimides are used for patterning and/or passivation steps [1,2]. Typical challenges in removing these materials include long process times, short bath life, corrosion, sludge formation, and filter clogging. This paper presents a novel tool design that addresses these issues by a high rate of hydrodynamic agitation that maintains a thin boundary layer at the wafer surface. The outcome is quick removal and breakdown of the sacrificial layer, independent of pitch and without all the negative side effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it